ALHP/ALHP.GO
6
42
Fork 9
Code Issues 25 Pull Requests Projects Releases Wiki Activity

linux, linux-zen, linux-rt and other kernels broken #186

New Issue
Closed
opened 2023-05-11 01:32:08 +02:00 by esteban_x64 · 3 comments
esteban_x64 commented 2023-05-11 01:32:08 +02:00
Copy Link

It seems that since april 28 the package linux has been broken when was updated to 6.3.x

image

It seems that since april 28 the package linux has been broken when was updated to 6.3.x ![image](/attachments/bda59b82-5e17-449a-8a05-58c5cba2de10)
image.png
139 KiB
anonfunc commented 2023-05-11 14:15:38 +02:00
Owner
Copy Link

There are different reasons why each failed. linux-rt, linux-rt-lts and linux-hardened failed because of a problem with the peak-memory package queuing logic, which I already resolved, so they should build fine next version.

I'm not sure what happened with linux-zen, have to look into that later.

As for linux: That failed because the patches ALHP uses to introduce an x86-64-vN build target failed to apply, as you can infer from the status page.

I consider switching to using KCFLAGS/KCPPFLAGS for kernel builds anyways, that would enable us to simplify the build logic and make us independent from the patches graysky provides.

There are different reasons why each failed. `linux-rt`, `linux-rt-lts` and `linux-hardened` failed because of a problem with the peak-memory package queuing logic, which I already resolved, so they *should* build fine next version. I'm not sure what happened with `linux-zen`, have to look into that later. As for `linux`: That failed because the patches ALHP uses to introduce an x86-64-vN build target failed to apply, as you can infer from the status page. I consider switching to using `KCFLAGS`/`KCPPFLAGS` for kernel builds anyways, that would enable us to simplify the build logic and make us independent from the [patches graysky provides](https://github.com/graysky2/kernel_compiler_patch).
anonfunc added the
bug
 label 2023-05-11 14:15:41 +02:00
anonfunc commented 2023-05-16 03:15:07 +02:00
Owner
Copy Link

I just switched ALHP to use KCFLAGS/KCPPFLAGS and requeued linux and linux-zen. That should resolve this issue.

I just switched ALHP to use `KCFLAGS`/`KCPPFLAGS` and requeued `linux` and `linux-zen`. That should resolve this issue.
esteban_x64 commented 2023-05-22 19:29:41 +02:00
Author
Copy Link

@anonfunc thank you so much for your effort fixing and maintaining this repo!
I already have my kernels updated with v3 :)

@anonfunc thank you so much for your effort fixing and maintaining this repo! I already have my kernels updated with v3 :)
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Branch/Tag Specified
Branches Tags
Labels
Clear labels
blocked upstream
bug
Something is not working
build-failure
package build fails
duplicate
This issue or pull request already exists
enhancement
New feature
help wanted
Need some help
informational
Provides information about something
invalid
Something is wrong
invalid/corrupt package
Package needs to be rebuild
packaging issue
priority: high
High priority
question
More information is needed
support
wontfix
This won't be fixed
No Label
bug
Milestone
No items
No Milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
anonfunc
No Assignees
2 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: ALHP/ALHP.GO#186
No description provided.
Delete Branch "%!s()"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?