gettext package: missing files

jbl007 commented

2024-09-08 14:31:45 +02:00

gettext 0.22.5-1.1 ALHP package does not contain textstyle files in lib and include dir

👍 1

d3Xt3r commented

2024-09-09 06:50:51 +02:00

Can confirm. Ran into this issue when trying to build mesa-git, which failed due to bison --version failing due to missing libtextstyle.so.0.

I then proceeded to check the upstream file list for gettext which did include usr/lib/libtextstyle.so.0. So I ran a diff between a pacman -Ql gettext comparing Arch vs ALHP's versions, and got this:

$ diff gettext-arch.log gettext-ALHP.log
28,32d27
< gettext /usr/include/textstyle.h
< gettext /usr/include/textstyle/
< gettext /usr/include/textstyle/stdbool.h
< gettext /usr/include/textstyle/version.h
< gettext /usr/include/textstyle/woe32dll.h
50,52d44
< gettext /usr/lib/libtextstyle.so
< gettext /usr/lib/libtextstyle.so.0
< gettext /usr/lib/libtextstyle.so.0.2.1
130d121
< gettext /usr/share/info/libtextstyle.info.gz

It's strange that ALHP's version is missing all this, when the package version is identical (except for the pkgrel). I wonder how this happened - does ALHP also make changes to the PKGBUILDs, if so, where can I find these customised PKGBUILDS?

Can confirm. Ran into this issue when trying to build `mesa-git`, which failed due to `bison --version` failing due to missing `libtextstyle.so.0`. I then proceeded to check the upstream [file list for gettext](https://archlinux.org/packages/core/x86_64/gettext/files/) which did include `usr/lib/libtextstyle.so.0`. So I ran a diff between a `pacman -Ql gettext` comparing Arch vs ALHP's versions, and got this: ``` $ diff gettext-arch.log gettext-ALHP.log 28,32d27 < gettext /usr/include/textstyle.h < gettext /usr/include/textstyle/ < gettext /usr/include/textstyle/stdbool.h < gettext /usr/include/textstyle/version.h < gettext /usr/include/textstyle/woe32dll.h 50,52d44 < gettext /usr/lib/libtextstyle.so < gettext /usr/lib/libtextstyle.so.0 < gettext /usr/lib/libtextstyle.so.0.2.1 130d121 < gettext /usr/share/info/libtextstyle.info.gz ``` It's strange that ALHP's version is missing all this, when the package version is identical (except for the pkgrel). I wonder how this happened - does ALHP also make changes to the PKGBUILDs, if so, where can I find these customised PKGBUILDS?

gettext-arch.log

14 KiB

gettext-ALHP.log

14 KiB

anonfunc commented

2024-09-15 11:58:12 +02:00

Owner

Did you maybe hit https://gitlab.archlinux.org/archlinux/packaging/packages/gettext/-/issues/3? Does it work with 0.22.5-2.1?

It's strange that ALHP's version is missing all this, when the package version is identical (except for the pkgrel). I wonder how this happened - does ALHP also make changes to the PKGBUILDs, if so, where can I find these customised PKGBUILDS?

ALHP does not modify anything except what you can find in this repo, e.g. the kernels.

Did you maybe hit https://gitlab.archlinux.org/archlinux/packaging/packages/gettext/-/issues/3? Does it work with `0.22.5-2.1`? > It's strange that ALHP's version is missing all this, when the package version is identical (except for the pkgrel). I wonder how this happened - does ALHP also make changes to the PKGBUILDs, if so, where can I find these customised PKGBUILDS? ALHP does not modify anything except what you can find in this repo, e.g. the kernels.

jbl007 commented

2024-09-20 16:44:20 +02:00

Author

Did you maybe hit https://gitlab.archlinux.org/archlinux/packaging/packages/gettext/-/issues/3?

Yes.

Does it work with 0.22.5-2.1?

Well, the files are still not there, but according the issue you mentioned above this is on purpose. And after upgrading bison, it works as intended.
Sorry for the false alarm.

> Did you maybe hit https://gitlab.archlinux.org/archlinux/packaging/packages/gettext/-/issues/3? Yes. > Does it work with `0.22.5-2.1`? Well, the files are still not there, but according the issue you mentioned above this is on purpose. And after upgrading bison, it works as intended. Sorry for the false alarm.

jbl007 closed this issue

2024-09-20 16:44:20 +02:00

anonfunc commented

2024-09-20 20:53:17 +02:00

Owner

Did you maybe hit https://gitlab.archlinux.org/archlinux/packaging/packages/gettext/-/issues/3?

Yes.

Does it work with 0.22.5-2.1?

Well, the files are still not there, but according the issue you mentioned above this is on purpose. And after upgrading bison, it works as intended.
Sorry for the false alarm.

No worries, good to see you got it working.

> > Did you maybe hit https://gitlab.archlinux.org/archlinux/packaging/packages/gettext/-/issues/3? > > Yes. > > > Does it work with `0.22.5-2.1`? > > Well, the files are still not there, but according the issue you mentioned above this is on purpose. And after upgrading bison, it works as intended. > Sorry for the false alarm. No worries, good to see you got it working.

gettext package: missing files #257