policy: improve readability
Increasing ev.type by one for these event types works due to the order of the elements in enum uevent_type, but makes the code harder to understand and debug. Imagine seeing the following event log: Mon Jun 27 22:08:43 2022 user.info usteer: usteer event=probe_req_deny node=hostapd.wl24-iot sta=e4:5f:01:00:92:b6 reason=better_candidate signal=-79 assoc=1 load=27 select_reason=signal remote=fe80::b2a7:b9ff:fecb:eeba#hostapd.wl24-iot remote_signal=-39 remote_assoc=13 remote_load=20 Trying to find probe_req_deny (UEV_PROBE_REQ_DENY) in the code will not yield any useful results. Assigning the enum element to ev.type makes it much easier to find where exactly the above log event comes from. Signed-off-by: Stijn Tintel <stijn@linux-ipv6.be> Acked-by: David Bauer <mail@david-bauer.net>
This commit is contained in:
9
policy.c
9
policy.c
@@ -223,21 +223,18 @@ usteer_check_request(struct sta_info *si, enum usteer_event_type type)
|
|||||||
out:
|
out:
|
||||||
switch (type) {
|
switch (type) {
|
||||||
case EVENT_TYPE_PROBE:
|
case EVENT_TYPE_PROBE:
|
||||||
ev.type = UEV_PROBE_REQ_ACCEPT;
|
ev.type = ret ? UEV_PROBE_REQ_ACCEPT : UEV_PROBE_REQ_DENY;
|
||||||
break;
|
break;
|
||||||
case EVENT_TYPE_ASSOC:
|
case EVENT_TYPE_ASSOC:
|
||||||
ev.type = UEV_ASSOC_REQ_ACCEPT;
|
ev.type = ret ? UEV_ASSOC_REQ_ACCEPT : UEV_ASSOC_REQ_DENY;
|
||||||
break;
|
break;
|
||||||
case EVENT_TYPE_AUTH:
|
case EVENT_TYPE_AUTH:
|
||||||
ev.type = UEV_AUTH_REQ_ACCEPT;
|
ev.type = ret ? UEV_AUTH_REQ_ACCEPT : UEV_AUTH_REQ_DENY;
|
||||||
break;
|
break;
|
||||||
default:
|
default:
|
||||||
break;
|
break;
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
if (!ret)
|
|
||||||
ev.type++;
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
if (!ret && si->stats[type].blocked_cur >= config.max_retry_band) {
|
if (!ret && si->stats[type].blocked_cur >= config.max_retry_band) {
|
||||||
ev.reason = UEV_REASON_RETRY_EXCEEDED;
|
ev.reason = UEV_REASON_RETRY_EXCEEDED;
|
||||||
ev.threshold.cur = si->stats[type].blocked_cur;
|
ev.threshold.cur = si->stats[type].blocked_cur;
|
||||||
|
Reference in New Issue
Block a user