diff --git a/doc/changelog.txt b/doc/changelog.txt
index 6f68e8f..ebfd95d 100644
--- a/doc/changelog.txt
+++ b/doc/changelog.txt
@@ -3,6 +3,7 @@
 - ipset: fix for compilation with 2.6.29-rt
 - rename xt_portscan to xt_lscan ("low-level scan") because
   "portscan" as a wor caused confusion
+- revert "TEE: do not use TOS for routing"
 
 
 Xtables-addons 1.10 (February 18 2009)
diff --git a/extensions/xt_TEE.c b/extensions/xt_TEE.c
index 265fc90..d137266 100644
--- a/extensions/xt_TEE.c
+++ b/extensions/xt_TEE.c
@@ -51,12 +51,14 @@ static const union nf_inet_addr tee_zero_address;
 static bool
 tee_tg_route4(struct sk_buff *skb, const struct xt_tee_tginfo *info)
 {
+	const struct iphdr *iph = ip_hdr(skb);
 	int err;
 	struct rtable *rt;
 	struct flowi fl;
 
 	memset(&fl, 0, sizeof(fl));
 	fl.nl_u.ip4_u.daddr = info->gw.ip;
+	fl.nl_u.ip4_u.tos   = RT_TOS(iph->tos);
 	fl.nl_u.ip4_u.scope = RT_SCOPE_UNIVERSE;
 
 	/* Trying to route the packet using the standard routing table. */