feat/additional_optimizations #117

Closed
RubenKelevra wants to merge 18 commits from RubenKelevra/ALHP.GO:feat/additional_optimizations into main
Contributor

Let's discuss :)

Let's discuss :)
RubenKelevra changed title from feat/additional_optimizations to WIP: feat/additional_optimizations 2022-05-14 20:14:21 +02:00
RubenKelevra force-pushed feat/additional_optimizations from d768ecc420 to ac537119bb 2022-05-14 21:30:34 +02:00 Compare
RubenKelevra changed title from WIP: feat/additional_optimizations to feat/additional_optimizations 2022-05-14 21:43:27 +02:00
Author
Contributor

From reading the GCC docs they should all be nul to slightly benefitial and a safe choice.

From reading the GCC docs they should all be nul to slightly benefitial and a safe choice.
RubenKelevra force-pushed feat/additional_optimizations from c5f2d5d3cb to 31de58baa7 2022-05-18 14:34:16 +02:00 Compare
Author
Contributor

@anonfunc should I split this?

@anonfunc should I split this?
Owner

That may be a good idea, since we can talk about specific options in detail instead of creating a huge messy thread here.

That may be a good idea, since we can talk about specific options in detail instead of creating a huge messy thread here.
Author
Contributor

There's a blocker for this PR we need to solve first: https://git.harting.dev/ALHP/ALHP.GO/issues/124

There's a blocker for this PR we need to solve first: https://git.harting.dev/ALHP/ALHP.GO/issues/124
Owner

Since there has been no activity recently, I'll close this.

Since there has been no activity recently, I'll close this.
anonfunc closed this pull request 2023-03-14 01:50:06 +01:00

Pull request closed

Sign in to join this conversation.
No description provided.